Over the past couple months there have been several news articles published around the country with headlines like, “Advocates Push Bail Reform to Stop Penalizing People for Being Poor,” and “In Jail, Too Poor to Make Bail.” While these news headlines create excitement and put the cross-hairs on a single protagonist (the bail industry) they are patently false. If these headlines were to be true, then there would have to be two assumptions that everyone would need to believe. First, that law enforcement is strategically going out and arresting people for merely being poor. Second, that rich people and poor people each follow a different set of laws. I think it is important to look at each of these assumptions separately, because when you do, I am sure that you will see how ridiculous the argument becomes.
Let’s look at the first statement, that “People are not arrested for being poor. The last time I looked there does not seem to be a law or ordinance in any county across the country that says it is a crime to be poor. Therefore, it only makes sense that there can never be a situation where someone is arrested for being poor. The hard truth is that the ONLY reason that someone is sitting in jail is because they have been “accused” of a crime. Somewhere at some time a law enforcement officer had “probable cause” to approach, question and arrest that individual for potentially committing a crime. This fact never seems to be mentioned in stories about so called bail reform, but as you can see it is an extremely important fact. People are not being arrested based on the size of their wallet, but rather on the good chance (probable cause) that they committed a crime.
The same goes for the second statement…”People do not sit in jail because they are poor.” Many of the arguments being made against the commercial bail industry today are all focused on the premise that bail agents only let rich people out of jail while ignoring those that are poor. These arguments are not only false, but completely myopic and foolish. To be honest, I think that this myopia is based on a lack of understanding of the purpose of bail and how it works. Let me explain why. First, if you were to ask any supporter of public sector pretrial programs how commercial bail works, I would bet you that the answer you would get would be incorrect or simply they might reply, “I don’t know.” The reason I say this is because if you fully understand how bail works, you could never say that the industry is unfair to the poor. Before I get into this a little more, I first wanted to deal with the other side of the coin…that the bail industry only serves rich people and helps them get out of jail, and debunk this myth as well. This explanation is actually pretty simple. The so called “Rich” people that opponents of commercial bail talk about, do not use bail bond agents. Instead, they write a check to the court for the full amount of the bail. Bill Cosby doesn’t need a bail agent, he writes a check and posts the full amount of the bail himself. If anything, this scenario shows how commercial bail industry isn’t designed for the rich, but rather it is specifically designed to level the playing field and help those that do not have the means to put up the full amount of the bond. Bail gives ALL socio economic levels an opportunity to be released by charging a small fee which is only a fraction of the full amount of the bail.
Next, when someone makes the statement that someone can’t get out of jail because they are poor, they don’t fully understand who the customer of a bail agent really is. A bail bond agent’s customer is NOT the defendant. It is the family, friends and extended members of the defendant’s social circle that want that defendant out. So the socio-economic situation of the defendant in reality is really irrelevant since they rarely are the ones paying to get themselves out. In fact, based on input from several of the nation’s largest sureties, 95% of those that are released from jail have their bail paid by a third party. Only a very small percentage of defendants self-bail…or pay their bail themselves. That third party contract is what makes bail so effective. Instead of relying on a defendant to show up and solely hold them accountable, bail ties an additional third party to the contract that has both an emotional and financial incentive to not only get that defendant to court, but also keep them out of trouble while they await trial.
As you can see, when you look more closely and fully understand the bail process and its purpose, it is easy to understand that bail agents do not discriminate against or feed on the poor. But rather they are a lifeline to those defendants and families who don’t have the ability to pay their own bail; all the while, providing better security for the community and accountability to the court around each defendant that is released. Aren’t those things the most important?
Based on the above facts, you really need to begin to question the credibility and motives behind those pushing the bail reform movement forward. To put a target on an industry that plays such an essential role in the criminal justice system seems misguided and illogical. If we truly want to reform our criminal justice system, the answer shouldn’t be to dismantle the private sector’s role, but rather to bring all stakeholder together including the bail industry to have meaningful and productive discussions to develop the most efficient and effective way to ensure that our system provides justice for everyone…not just the rich…and not just the poor.