Brian Nairin, President & CEO of AIA, blogging about the bail bond industry. AIA (Allegheny Casualty, International Fidelity and Associated Bond) is the largest and oldest bail bond insurance company in the nation.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
The interesting and troubling thing to me about this article (which can be viewed here… "Left in limbo, hundreds of Minnesotans with mental illness languish in jail” ) is that it really opened my eyes to the real misguided motivation of the pretrial community. And I say misguided because, personally, I honestly believe there is a purpose and role for pretrial services in helping people with special needs, but unfortunately in reality that purpose and role goes unfulfilled.
For example, according to the article, “on any given day, the Hennepin County jail holds 100-200 inmates with severe psychiatric disorders. That represents ¼ of the jail’s population, and they languish there, on average for three months before getting proper psychiatric care.” Notice how they don’t mention that those people are there because they can’t afford a bail bond.
Now I am under the impression that Pretrial Service Agencies were created to assist and manage these types of populations. They were designed to assist the truly indigent…those without means and without connections to family…those who have mental health issue or substance dependency/abuse issues. But the problem is they are failing when it comes to this mission. Instead they have taken their eye off the ball and focused it squarely on the commercial bail industry. Nowhere can I ever recall seeing something about the intent of pretrial services (when it was first conceived) to be about people should not have to pay for a bail bond. It has always been about making sure that those that need help get it. So why today is the sole purpose and mission of the pretrial community to eliminate money bail? Why are they so focused and committed to eliminating us as a pretrial release mechanism (especially when it has been proven time and time again to be the most effective way to ensure appearance)? Why are they so focused, that they would spend countless taxpayer dollars designating an entire month to spreading lies and negative stories about the bail industry? Wouldn’t it seem more appropriate to having a month dedicated to helping the people being held with mental disorders? Wouldn’t it be more beneficial and appropriate to have month dedicated to honoring the pretrial community’s successes in helping people with substance abuse issues? Those are the questions that I believe people want answered. Those are the questions that I believe the pretrial community needs to answer and should be answering.
Imagine if the pretrial community focused on achieving the mission on which they were first created…to helping those that can’t help themselves. Our jails might be a different place and our tax dollars might be going towards good as opposed to going towards public relations efforts and smear campaigns.
So here are my recommendations to both JPI and PJI. Designate a month dedicated to improving public safety. Reach out to the commercial bail industry and find ways to work together to make sure that the people in the system get the help they need. Acknowledge the role and effectiveness of commercial bail and show how the public is being protected more effectively when people are released on financially secured bail. If pretrial would to reach out in this way, I know that the bail community would reciprocate and acknowledge the role and effectiveness of pretrial services.
I honestly believe that if these things could happen, then the criminal justice system would be in a better place. Together we can be a positive force that is maintaining the proper level of accountability for those who are not indigent and taking care of those in a smart responsible way that are and need assistance. It is time to stop persecuting and smearing the commercial bail industry and time to start embracing us as a partner.
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
- The Bureau of Justice Statistics studies spanning 14 years (1990-2004) of release data in the country’s 75 most populous counties. These studies (year after year) showed that commercial bail was the most effective form of pretrial release for both appearance and reduced recidivism.
- The Tabarrok study, which assessed the failure to appear rates of several different types of pretrial release mechanisms, determined that commercial bail was the most effective way to prevent an FTA and ensure a defendants appearance in court.
- The ALEC study completed in 1995 that assessed the failure to appear rate in California’s three largest counties and determined that commercial bail was the most effective form of release.
- The ALEC study completed in 1997 that calculated a cost for a failure to appear in California’s three largest counties and determined that Pretrial release programs were potentially costing the counties millions of dollars.
- The JFA Institute Study completed in 2012 that shows that a very small portion (13%) of those in pretrial status in Los Angeles County are eligible for bail and that the jails are not crowded because people are languishing away unable to afford a bail bond.
- The University of Texas at Dallas Study that looked at 22,000 releases during 2008 and compared 4 types of release mechanisms, ultimately determining that commercial bail was the most effective way to ensure that defendants show up for court. An additional finding from this study was that the cost of an FTA was discovered to be approximately $1800 per defendant. Using that cost figure, it was determined that commercial bail saved Dallas County over $11 Million.
So then why would PJI and JPI declare that September is Bail Month? That is a good question? The answer of course is not to promote bail, or even promote pretrial (because it is hard to do that without any statistics…and remember, 2013 is the year of statistics, right?). The answer is that the pretrial community is going to ramp up their taxpayer funded anti–bail propaganda machine to once again spread lies and mis-information about the commercial bail industry (much like last year’s efforts which resulted in the creation of the War on Public Safety document by the American Bail Coalition).
The most unfortunate thing about this is that the pretrial community isn’t doing this because it benefits local communities and law enforcement. They aren’t doing this to educated people on the benefits and effectiveness of pretrial release (because that would make sense…and also, because we know that is too difficult to fabricate). They aren’t doing this because it benefits crime victims and various advocacy groups. And they are definitely not doing this because it saves counties money and lowers recidivism rates. Then why, you ask? Because it serves the purpose of the pretrial supporters. In their mind, they need to constantly justify how good they are by declaring how bad commercial bail is, and in doing so they are able to feel good about themselves. The problem is feeling good about yourself and just saying you’re better doesn’t make you better.
If the pretrial community wants to declare September “Bail Month” then I think the bail community should fully embrace and endorse their call to action. I move that during the month of September that the bail industry dispense and share “our” collective knowledge and research with those in the criminal justice system. We need to make sure that the real “statistics” are being shared so that local jurisdictions can make the best criminal justice decisions possible. It is time for the bail community to stand up and be heard and I can’t think of a better time to do so. After all, it is Bail Month.
If you would like to receive copies of any of the above research studies, please visit our bail bond resource library and select which studies you are interested in.
- ▼ September (2)
- Behind the Paper with Brian Nairin
- Brian Nairin is a nationally recognized expert in bail law who graduated with honors from Loyola Law School and was admitted to the California Bar in 1989. In 1997, Brian became President of Associated Bond. In the same year, he was elected President of the National Association of Bail Insurance Companies (NABIC), which was recently replaced by the American Bail Coalition (ABC). Brian serves as an officer of International Fidelity Insurance Company (IFIC) and Allegheny Casualty Company (ACC). In 2003, the bail underwriting functions of IFIC and ACC for the entire United States were moved to Calabasas in 2003 under the direction and leadership of Brian where he became President and CEO of what is now the AIA family of companies. Additionally, Brian has served as the primary educator for the California Bail Agents Association’s (CBAA) continuing education curriculum. Moreover, Brian has been retained to serve as an expert in numerous litigation and regulatory matters relating to bail. He has also served on the Board of Directors of Strike Back!
- 8th amendment (1)
- aia (6)
- AIA National Conference (1)
- bail (2)
- bail bond (6)
- bail bond agent (1)
- bail bond blog (1)
- Bail Bond Industry (18)
- Bail bond industry associations (1)
- Bail bond Insurance (9)
- bail bond insurance company (1)
- Bail Bond Surety (10)
- Bail Bond Technology (3)
- Bail Bonds (11)
- bail bondsman (2)
- Bail Insurance (1)
- Bail Surety (2)
- bails bond (1)
- blog (1)
- bondsman (1)
- bondsmen (1)
- brian nairin (4)
- commercial bail (1)
- expertbail (6)
- jail (2)
- Marketing (1)
- pretrial release (6)
- san jose (1)